6 Responses to Why many French DMO’s will fail with Web2.0 and Travel2.0? Some views!

  1. Blogontravel says:

    I read your twitter update concerning this article on hotelitour. Thank you for spreading the news about new posts on twitter.

    Could you please explain 4 of those bullet points reasons you gave, and which are not very clear to me:

    >”Lack of Internet understanding about the news business model and multichannel”
    >”Political reasons and thinking outside the new realities of Internet”
    >”Administrativ process”
    >”Decison process out of the game”

    Thank you.

    PS: By the way, there is an integrated spell checker to wordpress. You might want to use it.

  2. Joe Buhler says:

    Claude,
    Excellent arguments you make here. They apply to DMOs outside France as well. It’s a global issue. The ones who are really engaged in the conversation are a minority and it will take those of us who try to educate them much more time, I’m afraid. Maybe too long for them to stay relevant as has been reported after ENTER and on Travel-Rant just in the past few days.

    This issue is not limited to DMOs though and applies to a number of other traditional businesses in the travel industry that existed prior to online travel and still seem to live in a parallel universe from the one those of us who are on the T-List and blog about what’s happening live in.

  3. Claude says:

    @Joe
    Thanks for your comment and for sharing your views. As you say and know, it’s a global issue in the DMO’s World.
    Fro France, who is a administrativ country, with a spirit in pyramid from Paris or from decision desk, it’s a killer issue. So I can tell they don’t understand the network spirit and the Travel2.0 spirit

    @Sylvain / Blogontravel
    My explanations for your question:

    Could you please explain 4 of those bullet points reasons you gave, and which are not very clear to me:

    >”Lack of Internet understanding about the news business model and multichannel”
    Only few DMO’s in France understand the business model of Internet, the importance on quality content + context content, the way to deal between private and public sector, etc

    >”Political reasons and thinking outside the new realities of Internet”
    Remember : 4 level for tourism promotion and marketing : city level, department level, regional level and national level.
    Today main cities and main regional level are from ‘gauche’ side (would say “democrat” for US) National level and Tourism ministery are from “droite” side (would say “Republican” for US).
    Every level have is own marketing, is own politicial ambition and goals, on a territory who have no reality for the tourist and specially on Internet (except city territory)
    Imagine all the money and energy spending for nothing or for just the ego from political guys…….

    >”Administrativ process”
    France is the best an number one country for administrativ process ;-)

    >”Decision process out of the game”
    We all know, and you in the hotel industry, that we need to decid very quickly on Internet.
    DMO’s decision process is a mix of political goals (point 1), administrativ goals, executive goals, technical goals, …..
    so no easy.
    End customers are at the end of the decision process and are not the main focus point.
    Please return to point 1 to understand ;-)

    Hope my explantion are clear.

    Even if I look like desabused, I still believe we can do something. No with all DMO’s, but with 30 % to 40 % DMO’s who are dynamic and open mind.

  4. Marc says:

    Just a precision : what’s DMO stands for ? :D
    Thank you for the definition…

  5. Claude says:

    @Marc
    In this case, DMO = Destination Management Organisation (tourism actors who make promotion and marketing for a destination like city, tourisme area)

    and for France
    DMO = Tourism Board, Comité Departemental du Tourisme, Comité Régional du Tourisme

    Joe explain he see the same behaviors outside France. Even if in foreign countries, DMO are a mix of public & private funding, or even private.

    Well, hopefully, they are 30 % to 40 % who are open mind and dynamic ;-)

  6. Really interesting topic going on here…Thanks alot for this usefull information really learnt alot from it and a good contribution by you on the web. Keep it up with good blogs like this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>